Law Offices of Charles D. Naylor

Expert legal representation for maritime workers and cruise ship passengers.

310-514-1200
  • Free Injury Hotlines
    • Cruise Injury Hotline
    • Longshore Injury Hotline
    • Seamen Injury Hotline
    • Shipyard Injury Hotline
  • Practice Areas
    • Maritime Personal Injury
    • Jones Act
    • Cruise Ship Injury
    • Commercial Fishing Injury
    • Longshore & Harbor Workers
    • Shipyard Accidents Attorney
    • Maritime Wrongful Death
    • Maritime Trucking Accidents
    • Boating Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injury
    • Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA)
    • Defense Base Act
  • About Us
    • Charles D. Naylor
    • How We Work
  • Client Reviews
    • Verdicts & Settlements
    • Longshore Worker Wrongful Death Claim
    • Client Satisfaction Survey
  • Legal Resources
  • Videos
    • Injured At Work?
    • How To Choose The Best Doctor
    • What Is The Longshore Act?
    • Cruise Ship Injuries: Know Your Rights!
    • Naylor: Attorney of the Year Finalist
    • Defense Base Act
    • Commercial Fishing Accidents
    • What Is The Jones Act?
    • How To Document An Accident Scene At Work
  • Blog
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / In The News / LA Jury Returns Verdict Against Carmaker

March 9, 2007 By naylorlaw

LA Jury Returns Verdict Against Carmaker

ASSOCIATED PRESS

By Robert Jablon

A jury ruled that DaimlerChrysler must pay about $54 million to the family of a longshoreman who was killed by a Dodge truck that backed over him at the Port of Los Angeles, attorneys said Friday.

A Superior Court jury awarded damages to the family of Richard Mraz, 38, of San Pedro, in a negligence and product liability suit.

The panel awarded $50 million in punitive damages on Wednesday. It awarded $5.2 million in compensatory damages on March 2, of which DaimlerChrysler (nyse: DCX – news – people ) was to pay about $4 million.

The company said it is considering an appeal.

Mraz suffered fatal head injuries when he was run over by a 1992 Dodge Dakota at a container terminal on April 13, 2004.

Both sides said he had left the truck running without setting the parking brake, but they differed on who was to blame for the accident.

Attorneys for Mraz’s wife and family argued that a defect in the truck’s automatic transmission made it appear that it was in the park position when it actually was between gears. They say the truck slipped into reverse after Mraz got out.

They argued that the automaker had received more than 1,000 “park-to-reverse” complaints involving1988 through 2003 model Dakotas. The company issued a recall in 2000 but it was for repairs that failed to fix the problem, said Charles Naylor, an attorney for the family.

“The recall is phony. It didn’t work. There are people out there, lots of them … their cars will still malfunction,” Naylor said Friday.

The jurors found that DaimlerChrysler was negligent in the truck’s design and for failing to warn consumers or adequately recall the vehicle, Naylor said.

The suit didn’t request a court order requiring DaimlerChrysler to fix the alleged problem because that might impinge on federal regulatory statutes, Naylor added.

DaimlerChrysler denied there was a defect and argued that Mraz failed to follow proper safety procedures.

“We were pretty clear throughout this trial that there was no defect as alleged … and that Mr. Mraz, unfortunately, left the vehicle in a hurry in full-powered reverse and then he compounded that error by trying to re-enter a moving vehicle,” said Michael Palese, DaimlerChrysler’s head of legal communications in Detroit.

“That was a tragic mistake. Our sympathy goes out to him and his family,” he said. “It’s kind of easy to blame the vehicle but it wasn’t the vehicle.”

The jurors found the company was 75 percent responsible for the accident, while assigning 10 percent of the blame to Mraz and 15 percent to Mraz’s employer, who owned the truck.

However, the employer, APL, settled its portion of the case for an undisclosed amount last fall and will not have to pay any more damages, Palese said.

Filed Under: In The News

Get a
Free Case Review

Are You Injured?

  • Cruise Injury Hotline
  • Longshore Injury Hotline
  • Seamen Injury Hotline
  • Shipyard Injury Hotline

Know Your Rights

  • Injured At Work? Here’s What You Need to Know
  • How To Document An Accident Scene At Work
  • How To Choose The Best Doctor For Your Compensation Claim
  • Commercial Fishing Accidents: What You Should Know
  • Defense Base Act: Coverage, Benefits and Compensation
  • What Is The Jones Act?
  • What Is The Longshore And Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act?
  • Cruise Ship Injuries And Your Rights
  • Charles D. Naylor Named Consumer Attorney of the Year Finalist
Best Lawyers Lawyer of the Year Charles D. Naylor Certified Specialist_Charles D. Naylor
Workers Injury Law and Advocacy Group_Charles D. Naylor American Association for Justice_Charles D Naylor

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Connect

Copyright © 2023 · NaylorLaw.com. All Rights Reserved. · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer · Sitemap · Call Us Toll-Free: 888-440-5829 · Local: 310-514-1200 ·
Law Offices of Charles D. Naylor · 11 Golden Shore, Suite 350, Long Beach, CA 90802